The Forecasting Systems Letter Jeffrey Mishlove Back After a 3.5 Year Hiatus
Let's Examine Stock Market Forecasts
As of today, the S&P 500 index stands at 1311, down from the
high in May, but still up about 60 points for the year. The first forecast that I will present is based on Nirvana Systems OmniTrader
2006 program. This is a fascinating, and highly rated, software package
that evaluates numerous technical indicators, and trading approaches, against
particular price charts. The version that I use is augmented by neural network
artificial intelligence to optimize trading signals, based on a vote of
the best performing indicators. Below is an OmniTrader chart showing the
S&P 500 futures contract -- which, itself, is a predictor of the S&P
500 index:
One can clearly see that prices have been steadily rising, in an
upward trend since the July low. The OmniTrader signal suggests that prices
will continue and will probably test the highs of last May. Below is another forecast that clearly supports the bullishness
of OmniTrader. I subscribe to a relatively new system, developed by forecasting
wizard Tom Joseph (creator of the highly acclaimed Advanced GET) called
Dynamic Trend
Profile. This system contains proprietary forecasts of the overall stock
market using different time frames or "rooms" -- as diagrammed below. They
range in size from 30-60 minutes (the DA "room" on the far right) to 4-10
months (the PC "room" on the far left):
A third software program, BioComp Systems Dakota, also offers a positive prognostication for the overall stock market. Dakota is one of the newest, and most original, financial forecasting packages available. It uses a technology known as "swarming bots" to provide continually adaptive, real-time (or constantly out-of-sample) trading signals. The chart below shows the positive trading signal for the S&P 500 futures contract using the "Double Smoothed Stochastic Bot." The chart at the top shows the price of the S&P futures contract,
with buy and sell signals from Dakota, during approximately the past year.
The red oscillator in the middle is the actual Dakota trading signal. The
green line at the bottom shows the overall equity from trading. This Dakota
signal yielded over 318 points trading this contract during the past year.
But, not all forecasters will agree with this buy signal. According to the Financial Forecast Center, by January 2007 the index
will be down more than 3% to 1267. The graph provided on their website suggests
a steady downhill slope for the rest of the year. The website states: "All
forecasts are generated in-house using artificial intelligence. The forecast
models are 100% quantitative and use a global, long-range dataset....And
becauise the Financial Forecast Center has no ties to other companies or
institutions, our products and services are completely independent. The Financial
Forecast Center is a service of Financial Forecast Center, LLC. FFC LLC is
a m=smally, privately owned Texas corporation located in Houston, Texas,
USA." Kyle Atkinson is the FFC's founder and CEO. Are there other confirmations of this negative projection? The
index of
leading economic indicators is down from it's high in January 2006,
suggesting a slight business slowdown. Richard Russell, author of Dow Theory Letters,
notes that the Dow Transports have been moving down for the year, while the
Dow Industrials are moving up. This divergence suggests a lack of clear direction
in the markets. Overall, Russell believes that we are still in a primary
bear market. What are investors, in general, saying about the market? Below are
the charts showing the bullish and bearish sentiments, surveyed by the American Institute of Individual
Investors, from among their own members:
As you can see, the bearish sentiment is down dramatically from
its peak in July, and the bullish sentiment is, correspondingly, up (albeit
moderately) from its trough in July. Ironically, these sentiment statistics
are often used by traders in a contrarian manner, reflecting the fact, I
suppose, that individual investors are often wrong about market direction.
Not much in the way of a clear signal here. Now, let's compare the sentiment of individual investors with that
of professional investment advisors. Below is the data as tracked by Investors
Intelligence:
Here we see much clearer trends with bullish sentiment showing a
decline since the beginning of the year, while bearish sentiment is on a
corresponding increase. The shifts since the July turning points are less
dramatic than with the individual investors. What are we to make of this?
There are two schools of thought (naturally, representing the two different
camps). One of them goes by the maxim that "individuals who serve as their
own investment advisors have fools for clients." The other school of thought
(to which I am generally inclined) suggests that individual investors actually
outperform investment advisors. It would seem that if we view the investment
advisor sentiment readings as a contrarian indicator, we would be more bullish
today than we were at the beginning of the year. In any case, it strikes me that the software systems above -- Nirvana
OmniTrader, Tom Joseph's Dynamic Trend Profile, and Biocomp Systems Dakota
are all far more useful than either investor sentiment or investment advisor
sentiment. How would I synthesize all of these various signals, sentiments
and opinions? In spite of many grave reservations (which, perhaps, I shall
report on in a future Forecasting Systems
Letter), I am bullish for the time-being.
To receive notification
of new Forecasting Systems Letters, visit --
|
||